State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack
O'Connell joined representatives of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) to
announce a landmark agreement that ensures California students who are classified as
disabled because of diabetes will be safe at school and enjoy the same legally-required
educational opportunities as their peers. The agreement clarifies the rights of eligible
students with diabetes in every school district throughout the state.
"Through this cooperative agreement with the ADA, the CDE is committed
to ensuring that all children with diabetes in California schools have access to legally
required care during the school day," O'Connell said. "A lack of resources, uncertainty
about how services are best delivered, and lack of clarity about state and federal
requirements have in some instances caused hardship to parents of children with
diabetes. No parent should have to put a job at risk in order to administer legallyrequired diabetes treatment to their child during the school day."
The announcement brings to an end litigation, filed by four families and the
American Diabetes Association in federal district court in San Francisco, alleging that
some California school districts were not providing insulin administration and other
services to students with diabetes-related disabilities who were legally entitled to them
while at school.
Under the agreement, each local education agency (LEA) will manage the
delivery of this care in the best possible way for those students whose Individualized
Education Programs or 504 Plans require administration of insulin and related services
during the school day. The CDE will issue a Legal Advisory to all California school
districts providing guidance on health care services for students with diabetes and
outlining the rights of these students under federal anti-discrimination and special
education statutes-Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
The
Advisory explicitly states that school districts have an obligation to provide insulin
administration and related services to eligible students who need the assistance.
According to the California Department of Education, state law permits seven
categories of individuals to administer insulin to students at school, including school
nurses or other health care professionals, a self-administering student, and family
members and friends (a complete list may be found in the Legal Advisory). The
agreement provides that when school nurses or other school health care professionals
are not available a school employee who is unlicensed and who has been adequately
trained may administer insulin pursuant to the student's treating physician's orders.
"While provision of these services by licensed professionals is preferable,"
O'Connell said, "given the lack of nurses in many California schools, it may not always
be possible for a licensed professional to meet those needs. This agreement spells out
a school district's obligation to train other qualified personnel to provide the services and
support that students with diabetes are legally entitled to receive in order to attend and
succeed in a public school setting."
The lawsuit was filed as a class action in October 2005 against the CDE and two
Bay Area school districts (San Ramon Valley Unified and Fremont Unified), under
federal disability civil rights and special education laws. Each district has entered into a
separate agreement with the plaintiffs that details the care that it will provide to its
students with diabetes.
"This settlement is a tremendous breakthrough for students with diabetes in
California and nationwide," said Larisa Cummings, an attorney with the Disability Rights
Education and Defense Fund (DREDF), a public interest law and policy center that,
along with the law firm Reed Smith LLP, represented the children and the ADA in this
matter. "The CDE is setting the standard in California for ensuring that children with
diabetes receive the assistance and services they need."
The Legal Advisory will remind districts that policies limiting the type or location
of diabetes care to be provided to students, without considering the individual needs of
each student, violate the law. For example, policies that ban blood glucose testing in
the classroom or that automatically place students needing assistance with diabetes
care in a particular school are not permitted. A copy of the Legal Advisory can be found
on the California Department of Education Website at
cde.ca/ls/he/hn/diabetesmgmt.asp and at the DREDF website at
dredf/advocacy/CDE Legal Advisory on Rights of Students with
Diabetes.pdf
The San Ramon Valley Unified School District recently adopted an approach that
involves training school employees to administer insulin and perform other diabetes
care tasks -- adopting procedures and forms that plaintiffs hope will serve as models for
districts around the state and nation.
DREDF attorneys included Arlene Mayerson and Larisa Cummings. The pro
bono team of attorneys from the Oakland and San Francisco offices of Reed Smith
included James M. Wood, Kenneth J. Philpot, Michael F. McCabe, Kurt Kearl, Julia
Butler, Roxanne Garibay, James Heffner, Tita Bell, Kendra Jue and Kristen Soetebier.
The Reed Smith team donated more than $2.6 million worth of pro bono legal services
to the case.
"This agreement changes the landscape for children with diabetes and helps
ensure that they receive the assistance they need from school personnel so they can
take part in all educational programs." said Mr. Wood. "It is truly amazing the level of
change that can be effected when the legal expertise of a national disability rights
organization like DREDF, the medical and policy expertise of the ADA and the pro bono
resources and power of an international law firm are applied to a critical public policy
issue."
Parents of children with diabetes throughout California hailed today's
announcement as an important step forward.
"This favorable outcome is a tremendous victory -- not just for students who have
diabetes and their families, but for schools themselves. Clarifying responsibilities is a
major step towards facilitating better communication between schools and parents and
very simply providing kids both with what they need and are entitled to have," said
Laura (Lahle) Wolfe, parent of Elizabeth Ehrlich of Upland, California. Elizabeth's
parents removed her from the Upland Unified School District because they believed the
district was not providing her with adequate diabetes care services.
"This is a significant achievement in the national effort toward improving the
health of children with diabetes who must have the ability to control their blood glucose
levels during the many hours spent at school and in school-related activities," said Ann
Albright, PhD, RD, and President, Health Care & Education of the American Diabetes
Association. Dr. Albright, who has great expertise on this issue from her experience as
the former Chief of the California Diabetes Prevention and Control Program, added,
"The support of school nurses and other trained adults in school settings is essential to
these children's day-to-day health and their longer-term survival. We hope other states
will look to this model agreement with the CDE in improving their efforts in diabetes
care."
About the American Diabetes Association (ADA)
The American Diabetes Association is the nation's leading voluntary health organization
supporting diabetes research, information and advocacy. The Association's advocacy
efforts include helping to combat discrimination against people with diabetes;
advocating for the increase of federal diabetes research and programs; and improved
access to, and quality of, healthcare for people with diabetes. Founded in 1940, the
Association's mission is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all
people affected by diabetes. In 2004, the ADA launched its "Safe at School" campaign,
a multi-faceted effort to ensure that all students with diabetes are medically safe at
school and have the same access to educational opportunities as their peers. The
Campaign is supported by the medical and scientific expertise of the ADA and the
energy and commitment of its top volunteer leaders and grassroots advocates.
About Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, Inc. (DREDF)
Founded in 1979 by people with disabilities and parents of children with disabilities, the
Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, Inc. (DREDF) is a national law and
policy center dedicated to protecting and advancing the civil rights of people with
disabilities through legislation, litigation, advocacy, technical assistance, and education
and training of attorneys, advocates, persons with disabilities, and parents of children
with disabilities. DREDF is a Parent Training and Information Center under IDEA as
well as a Community Parent Resource Center for Foster Children with Disabilities.
About Reed Smith LLP
Reed Smith is one of the 15 largest law firms in the world, with more than 1,500 lawyers
in 21 offices throughout the United States, Europe and the Middle East. Founded in
1877, the firm represents leading international businesses from Fortune 100
corporations to mid-market and emerging enterprises. Its attorneys provide litigation
services in multi-jurisdictional matters and other high stake disputes, deliver regulatory
counsel, and execute the full range of strategic domestic and cross-border transactions.
Reed Smith is a preeminent advisor to industries including financial services, life
sciences, health care, advertising and media, shipping, international trade and
commodities, real estate, manufacturing, and education. For more information, visit
reedsmith.
diabetes